Allen, Danielle (2003). Talking to Strangers: Anxieties of Citizenship since Brown vs. Board of Education. Chicago, Ill.: University of Chicago Press

Appel Olsen, Frederik (2023). “Forskeroprør ved Klimaministeriet: Urolig videnskabelig etos ved Scientist Rebellions teach-in-demonstration”. Rhetorica Scandinavica, 27 (86), s. 160-179

Aristoteles (1991). Retorik. Oversat af T. Hastrup. København: Museum Tuscalanums Forlag

Baumlin, James S. (1994). “Positioning Ethos in Historical and Contemporary Theory”. I: Baumlin, James S. & Baumlin, Tita French (red.). Ethos: New Essays in Rhetorical and Critical Theory. Dallas, TX: Southern Methodist University Press, s. xi-xxx

Baumlin, James S. & Meyer, Craig A. (red.) (2022). Histories of Ethos: World Perspectives on Rhetoric. Basel: MDPI Books

Bengtsson, Mette & Rønlev, Rasmus (2021). “En medieprovokatør bliver til: Personakonstruktioner og -transformationer i Eva Selsings retorik”. Rhetorica Scandinavica, 25 (83), s. 22-39

Bruhn, Tommy (2019). “Rhetorical Ambiguity and Political Leadership: Ethos and Negotiation in Fredrik Reinfeldt’s 2005 ‘Welcome to the New Moderates’ Speech’”. Res Rhetorica, 6 (2), s. 19-32

Burke, Kenneth (1959). Attitudes towards History. 3. udgave. Berkeley / Los Angeles, Calif.: University of California Press

Burke, Kenneth (1969). A Rhetoric of Motives. Berkeley, Calif.: University of California Press

Campbell, Karlyn Kohrs (1998). “The Discursive Performance of Femininity: Hating Hillary”. Rhetoric and Public Affairs, 1 (1), s. 1-19

Ceccarelli, Leah (2016). “Scientific Ethos and the Cinematic Zombie Outbreak: Science in Fictional Narratives”. Monograph Métode Science Studies Journal, 6, s. 107-113

Ceccarelli, Leah & Pamela Pietrucci (2019). “Scientist Citizens: Rhetoric and Responsibility in L’Aquila”. Rhetoric and Public Affairs, 22 (1), s. 95-128

Cherry, Roger D. (1988). “Ethos versus Persona: Self-Representation in Written Discourse”. Written Communication, 15 (3), s. 251-276

Finlayson, Alan (2022). “Brexit, YouTube and the Populist Rhetorical Ethos”. I: Kock, Christian & Villadsen, Lisa S. (red.). Populist Rhetorics. Cham: Palgrave Macmillian, s. 81-106

Gaonkar, Dilip P. (1997). “The Idea of Rhetoric in the Rhetoric of Science”. I: Gross, Alan G.  & Keith, William M. (red.). Rhetorical Hermeneutics: Invention and Interpretation in the Age of Science. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, s. 25-85

Gurak, Laura & Antonijevic, Smiljana (2009). “Digital Rhetoric and Public Discourse”. I: Lunsford, Andrea A.; Wilson, Kirt H. & Eberly, Rosa A. (red.). The Sage Handbook of Rhetorical Studies. Los Angeles, Calif.: Sage Publications, s. 497-508

Halloran, S. Michael (1982). “Aristotle’s Concept of Ethos, and If not His then Somebody Else’s”. Rhetoric Review, 1 (1), s. 58-63

Hoff-Clausen, Elisabeth (2008). “Ethos i antikken og det 20.-21. århundrede”. I: Online ethos. Webretorik i politiske kampagner, blogs og wikis. Frederiksberg: Samfundslitteratur.

Hyde, Michael J. (2004). “Introduction: Rhetorically, We Dwell”. I: Hyde, Michael J. & Schrag, Calvin O. (red.). The Ethos of Rhetoric. Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press, s. xiii-xxviii

Hyde, Michael & Schrag, Calvin O. (red.) (2004). The Ethos of Rhetoric. Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press

Isager, Christine (2003). “Reporteren og hans persona: Selvironi som retorisk strategi”. Rhetorica Scandinavica, 26, s. 20-36

Isager, Christine & Just, Sine (2012).  “En helt tredje Charlotte: Efterlignende fremførelse og karakterdannelse i Forklædt som nazist”. Rhetorica Scandinavica, 16 (62), s. 57-74

Isokrates (1986). “Antidosis (Om formuebytning)”. I: Fire taler. Oversat af T. Hastrup. København: Museum Tuscalanums Forlag

Johansen, Anders (2002). Talerens troverdighet. Tekniske og kulturelle betingelser for politisk retorikk. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget

Jørgensen, Charlotte & Onsberg, Merete (1999). Praktisk argumentation. 2. udgave. København: Teknisk Forlag.

Jørgensen, Charlotte; Kock, Christian & Rørbech, Lone (1994). Retorik der flytter stemmer. Hvordan man overbeviser i offentlig debat. København: Gyldendal.

Kjeldsen, Jens; Ihlen, Øyvind; Just, Sine N. & Larsson, Anders O. (2022). “Expert Ethos and the Strength of Networks: Negotiations of Credibility in Mediated Debate on COVID-19”. Health Promotion International, 37 (2), Article daab095

Kjeldsen, Jens; Mølster, Ragnhild & Ihlen, Øyvind (2022). “Expert Uncertainty: Arguments Bolstering the Ethos of Expertise in Situations of Uncertainty”. I: Oswald, Steve m.fl. (red.). The Pandemic of Argumentation. Argumentation Library 43. Cham: Springer, s. 85-103

Lunsford, Andrea A. & Ede, Lisa (1996). “Representing Audience: ‘Successful Discourse’ and Disciplinary Critique”. College Composition and Communication, 47 (2), s. 167-179

McCroskey, James C. (1968). An Introduction to Rhetorical Communication. Boston: Allyn & Bacon

McCroskey, James C. & Young, Thomas J. (1981). “Ethos and Credibility: The Construct and Its Measurements after Three Decades”. Central States Speech Journal, 32 (1), s. 24-34

Mehlenbacher, Ashley R. (2022). Expertise. Cultivating Character, Goodwill and Practical Wisdom. University Park, Penn.: Pennsylvania State Press

Miller, Arthur B. (1974). Aristotle on Habit and Character: Implications for the Rhetoric.” Speech Monographs, 41, s. 309-316

Miller, Carolyn R. (2003). “The Presumptions of Expertise: The Role of Ethos in Risk Analysis”. Configurations, 11 (2), s. 163-202

Miller, Carolyn R. & Shepherd, Dawn (2004). “Blogging as Social Action: A Genre Analysis of the Web Log”. I: Into the Blogosphere. Minneapolis, Minn.: University of Minnesota. https://hdl.handle.net/11299/172818

Molloy, Cathryn (2019). Rhetorical Ethos in Health and Medicine. Patient Credibility, Stigma, and Misdiagnosis. New York: Routledge

Mral, Brigitte & Vigsø, Orla (red.) (2013). Krisretorik: Retoriska aspekter på kriskommunikation. Åstorp: Retorikforlaget

Offerdal, Trude; Just, Sine N. & Ihlen, Øyvind (2021). “Public Ethos in the Pandemic Rhetorical Situation: Strategies for Building Trust in Authorities’ Risk Communication”. Journal of International Crisis and Risk Communication, 4 (2), s. 247-270

Perelman, Chaim & Olbrechts-Tyteca, Lucie (1969). The New Rhetoric – A Treatise on Argumentation. London: University of Notre Dame Press

Reynolds, Nedra (1993). “Ethos as Location: New Sites for Understanding Discursive Authority”. Rhetoric Review, 11 (2), s. 325-338

Roer, H. (2020). “Derfor er Brostrøm en god kommunikatør: Den svære kunst at være helt enkel”. Kommunikationsforum, 13. marts. https://www.kommunikationsforum.dk

Sattler, William (1947). “Conceptions of Ethos in Ancient Rhetoric”. Speech Monographs, 14, s. 55-65

Schmertz, Joanna (1999). “Constructing Essences: Ethos and the Postmodern Subject of Feminism”. Rhetoric Review, 18 (1), s. 82-91

Wilson, Noah (2020). “Algorithmic Dwelling: Ethos as Deformance in Online Spaces”. Rhetoric Review, 39 (2), s. 216-229

Zarefsky, David (2004). “George W. Bush Discovers Rhetoric: September 20, 2001, and the U.S. Response to Terrorism”. I: Hyde, Michael (red.). The Ethos of Rhetoric. Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press, s. 136-155