Publics-begrebet

Publics-begrebet Begrebet publics har ligesom sit søsterbegreb offentlighed en lang historie, og de to begreber er på mange måde tæt beslægtede, da de begge beskæftiger sig med at beskrive, hvordan folk samles i sfærer, der rækker ud over det private rum. Publics-begrebet har dog sin egen tradition og adskiller sig særligt fra offentlighedsbegrebet ved at […]

Log ind for at læse videre.
Supplerende læsning

Møller Hartley m.fl. 2021, Birkbak 2013, Marres 2005

Reference

Arsenault, Amelia H. (2017). “The datafication of media: Big data and the media industries”. International Journal of Media & Cultural Politics, 13 (1-2), s. 7-24. https://doi.org/10.1386

Birkbak, Andreas (2013). “From networked publics to issue publics: Reconsidering the public/private distinction in web science”. WebSci ’13: Proceedings of the 5th Annual ACM Web Science Conference, s. 24-32. https://doi.org/10.1145

boyd, danah (2008). “Why youth (heart) social network sites: The role of networked publics in teenage social life”. I: Buckingham, David (red.). Youth, Identity, and Digital Media. Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press

boyd, danah (2010). “Social network sites as networked publics: Affordances, dynamics, and implications”. I: Papacharissi, Zizi (red.). A Networked Self: Identity, Community, and Culture on Social Network Sites. New York: Routledge, s. 39-58

Bruns, Axel & Burgess, Jean (2015). “Twitter hashtags from ad hoc to calculated publics”. I: Rambukkana, Nathan (red.). Hashtag Publics: The Power and Politics of Discursive Networks. New York: Peter Lang, s. 13-28

Burgess, Jean; Galloway, Anne & Sauter, Theresa (2015). “Hashtag as hybrid forum: The case of #agchatoz”. I: Rambukkana, Nathan (red.). Hashtag Publics: The Power and Politics of Networked Discourse. New York: Peter Lang

Calhoun, Craig (2017). “2 facets of the public sphere: Dewey, Arendt, Habermas”. I: Engelstad, Fredrik; Larsen, Håkon; Rogstad, Jon & Steen-Johnsen, Kari (red.). Institutional Change in the Public Sphere. Berlin: De Gruyter Open. https://doi.org/10.1515

Fraser, Nancy (1990). “Rethinking the public sphere: A contribution to the critique of actually existing democracy”. Social Text, 25/26, s. 56-80. https://doi.org/10.2307

Gillespie, Tarleton (2014). “The relevance of algorithms”. I: Gillespie, Tarleton; Boczkowski, Pablo J. & Foot, Kirsten A. (red.). Media Technologies: Essays on Communication, Materiality, and Society. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, s. 167-193

Habermas, Jürgen (1989). The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry Into a Category of Bourgeois Society. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. [Tysk udgave 1962]

Holtzhausen, Derina (2016). “Datafication: Threat or opportunity for communication in the public sphere?” Journal of Communication Management, 20 (1), s. 21-36. https://doi.org/10.1108

Ito, Mizuko (2008). “Introduction”. I: Varnelis, Kazys (red.). Networked Publics. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press

Kristensen, Jakob Bæk; Henriksen, Frederik Møller & Mayerhöffer, Eva (2023). “Did COVID-19 blur partisan boundaries? A comparison of partisan affinity and source heterophily in online alternative news-sharing networks before and during the COVID-19 pandemic”. Social Media + Society, 9 (3). https://doi.org/10.1177

Lippmann, Walter (1925). The Phantom Public. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers

Marres, Noortje (2005). “Issues spark a public into being. A key but often forgotten point of the Lippmann-Dewey debate”. I: Latour, Bruno & Weibel, Peter (red.). Making Things Public. Atmospheres of Democracy. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press

Møller Hartley, Jannie; Bengtsson, Mette; Schjøtt Hansen, Anna & Sivertsen, Morten Fischer (2021). “Researching publics in datafied societies: Insights from four approaches to the concept of ‘publics’ and a (hybrid) research agenda”. New Media & Society, 25 (7). https://doi.org/10.1177

Møller Hartley, Jannie; Mathieu, David & Kirk Sørensen, Jannick (2023). Datapublics: The Construction of Publics in Datafied Democracies. Bristol: University Press

van Dijck, José (2014). “Datafication, dataism and dataveillance: Big Data between scientific paradigm and ideology”. Surveillance & Society, 12 (2), s. 197-208. https://doi.org/10.24908